Ant Hill Marketing

So, the Portland Timbers have apparently designed a new logo to be unveiled this Saturday as a step to help them move toward Major League Soccer. I’m interested to see what they’ve come up with. An article in today’s Oregonian about the logo mentions, “What if they unveil the new logo…and nobody cheers?” Well, if that happens, perhaps it’s because a logo doesn’t make the brand.

Below is a visual timeline that showcases the the various logos used by the Timbers, as it appeared in The Oregonian article.

What’s interesting, from a brand perspective is all the hoopla around the unveiling of a logo. If the identity used during the 2001-2004 timeframe didn’t “catch on with fans” perhaps it was less about the design and more to do with the Timbers‘ brand itself. Are the Timbers positioned well? What’s their distinction in the Portland sports market that sets them a part from other sporting options? It helps they are the only soccer team, but other than that, what’s the promise? And what does the brand stand for? I’m not sure I know and I’m a soccer fan. I do know that the Timbers along with owner and business phenom Merritt Paulson are hanging their hats on this as their step to the majors. And the development process took more than a year including research. All well and good, but that’s a lot riding on a mark. And, the questions I have for Paulson and the team? Tell me what the Timbers stand for. Tell me the experience I’ll have attending matches. Tell me what you are promising and how you’ll deliver. Then with the answers hold the new logo up in the mirror and tell me what you see.

[Added 6/12 post logo unveiling]

So the new Portland Timbers’ logo has been unveiled. See it for yourself here. Was there cheering? Don’t know. But the outcome is…just okay. Slightly uninspiring. At least the Oregon Ducks will surely enjoy the color combo.

Seattle's Best - new logo

Whatever happened to the distinct, strong brands? Will someone please tell me? It’s feeling more and more like a game of how low can you go to appeal to the masses. Granted Seattle’s Best is owned by Starbucks and the brand will be coming to a Burger King, Subway and movie theaters near you but did that mean to translate the brand’s identity in this way - oversimplified to the point of barely being recognizable? You dipped my Target into your blood bank.

So, I admit, the original Seattle’s Best logo was dated, as was the brand overall. But, at least the old logo had some history and recognition. It wasn’t in a circle. It didn’t have a tear drop. And, since when is coffee red?

What’s the consumer supposed to take away from this new and improved logo? Simple. Generic. Regular. Bland. Red coffee? And how does this reflect on the Seattle’s Best brand in general? With the shift to a broader scope of consumers and to potentially compete with the likes of Dunkin’ Donuts, positioning Seattle’s Best as the brand to go that mile versus Starbucks makes complete sense, but the way the Seattle’s Best brand is perceived is what will make or break this business decision. You might not like the coffee, but at least Dunkin’ Donuts has a huge, loyal following. Does anyone drink Seattle’s Best? Would you now?

If mediocrity was the goal then ding ding ding, we may have a winner. But brands that settle for mediocre tend to get that mediocrity reflected upon their products and consumers wind up walking on by. Hey you, Ms. Consumer. We know you want that cup right about now. How about a tall, steaming hot cup of average. Doesn’t that hit the spot? Mediocre doesn’t even get you to second best. It’s not even challenger status. It’s barely…there.

Starbucks has their own brand to maintain so I’ll cut some slack that adding a new brand to the mix makes their job slightly more work, but if they plan to be successful they need to look at a different brand architecture that allows the growth of the brands independently. Give Seattle’s Best the distinction that at least position’s it against the competition. Heck, make Dunkin’ Donuts run for their money.

It’s just a sad day when commonplace rules the roost. When you don’t stand for something, it makes it very difficult to compete on anything other than price. And competing on price turns the brand into a commodity. No business wants to be there. So, will all the distinct, strong brands out there please stand up? I’d like to buy you a cup of joe.

Chrysler is a registered trademark of Chrysler Group LLC., Fiat is a registered trademark of Fiat Group Automobiles SpA

We all know about the troubles of the Big Three automakers in America. Deteriorating market share, strengthening competition, buyouts, bailouts, selloffs, consolidations, greening, heath care costs, unions, suppliers, loans, losses, more losses, our money, their money, someone else’s money… in the eternal words of Shaggy Rogers (of Scooby-Doo fame)…zoinks!

Forgetting about the healthier two of the trio for the moment, let’s talk about Chrysler. Chrysler is in a unique and unenviable position. Always the underdog, Chrysler has been on the ropes for quite a while. After the Daimler/Chrysler foxtrot fizzled, a new dance partner stepped in, the venture capital firm Cerberus. A few months later, yet another dancer stepped into the ring, Mr. Economy. The ménage á trois of Cerebus, Chrysler and Mr. Economy quickly started to circle the sombrero of diminishing returns. With mounting losses and no new venture capital to be found the Cerberus/Crysler newlyweds, (along with their distant cousin, General Motors) went to Capitol Hill looking for a loan. We all know what happened there, we gave them money. But with Chrysler there was a caveat, they must find yet another new dancer to tango with, enter Fiat SpA. Expensive shoes, nicely coiffed hair, and some old world style.

So you may be asking how this applies to marketing? I’m getting to that. You see Fiat and Chrysler have little problem, it’s called time. Because of production cycles, engineering workload, scales of economy, exchange rates, legal wrangling, and perhaps the moon, the first big influx of Fiat-based Chrysler products won’t be released until model year 2012. That’s one-and-a-half model years before new products with new engineering and the new Fiat/Chrysler brand strategy are fully in place. One-and-a-half years of scraping together a viable product line. One-and-a-half years of gap filling marketing. One-and-a-half years is an eternity for a company losing market share and sucking wind as hard as Chrysler. So what are Fiat SpA and Chrysler going to do?

Well, the first step was to re-brand the Dodge Ram truck series into its own singular brand now called Ram. A new ad campaign featuring five TV spots showcasing the recreational and vocational attributes of the new Ram brand. Seven print ads, and a new website, RamTrucks.com to support the spots. To further support the work hard, play hard attitude of Ram Truck customers, Fiat SpA/Chrysler came up with the Outfitter.RamTrucks.com site. Within this online wonderland, you can purchase a Ram brand G-Shock watch or an 18-can camouflaged cooler, or a bunch of t-shirts and other apparel emblazoned with Ram brandiness. Or maybe that’s Brand Raminess. Oh and they also have a blog, “Ram Zone”, and they say they will also leverage social media such as Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Flickr, and the like to connect with like-minded Ram loyalists.

Next was to re-focus Dodge as a fun/lifestyle brand. Many of us have seen the “Man’s Last Stand” Super Bowl ad and the “We Make Getaway Cars” ad featuring the wheel-spinning tire-smoking, bad-ass Dodge Charger. These two ads, coming from distinctly different viewpoints, male and female, show how misogyny and misandry can both be relieved by pressing your right foot down really really hard on a gas petal. I’m not sure how these two TV spots speak to fun or lifestyle unless you enjoy lousy painful relationships.

Part three, re-focus Jeep to be a “dreamers/adventurers” brand. Jeep product advertising will center on lifestyle with the message that Jeep owners live life by their own set of rules/terms, “I live. I ride. I am. Jeep.” Kim Adams House, head of Jeep Brand Communications, “We want to expand the reach of the brand and provide examples…to see inside the people’s lives who embrace the Jeep lifestyle.” This is a switch from the traditional Jeep branding, the outdoor, go anywhere, macho vehicle that goes where no man has gone before, unless he had a Jeep of course. The new dreamers/adventurers advertising features a woman driving a convertible Jeep Wrangler after a visiting a hair salon in “It’s Only Hair,” a woman driving a carpool in a Jeep Liberty in “Open Lane,” a father and son and a Jeep Grand Cherokee story with a dad on a skateboard in “Dinner’s Ready,” and a Chihuahua in a Jeep Patriot living the good life in “This Dog’s Life.” Not your typical Jeep story lines.

Step D, do something with the Chrysler brand. Push it upscale? We know a couple models will be dropped, the PT Cruiser, and the woeful Sebring (it will be heavily reworked and brought back with a different name). That will leave the Chrysler brand with the 300 sedan and the Town and Country minivan. Not much of a brand lineup. There is talk of Fiat SpA bringing the Alfa Romeo brand back to the U.S., selling it through the Chrysler dealer network. It would give Chrysler a premium brand to compete against the likes of Lexus, Audi, Infinity, and Acura. But with Alfa having left the U.S. market during the mid-1990s with such a poor track record, will the memories and prejudices be able to be overcome? The campaign for that one will be most interesting.

So, as the next year and a half progresses Chrysler and Fiat SpA will have many challenges with repositioning, re-building and clawing their way out of the American automobile abyss. I have a feeling there will be more than one media rep with a smiling face, who will receive the windfall of this colossal reshaping of American perceptions. So turn off your DVRs, re-up your subscriptions, start watching those pitiful sitcoms and healthcare based dramas, and enjoy the front row seat watching it all happen. Besides, in the end, you probably paid for it.

Click to Read

‘Twas the night before deadline and all through the shop. Every creature was stirring…

We know what you’re thinking…”Uh oh, not another holiday letter.” Just read it. Please.

Think of it as our little tribute to 2009. Cheers!

The Hood to Coast Relay is reputed to be one of the premier running events of its kind in the country. Twelve thousand runners come from nearly every corner of the U.S. and many countries around the world.  They pile in two thousand large vehicles and set out on a quest to cover 197 miles as fast as their bodies will let them.  And, to a person, they will call it one of the most fun things they have done in their lives.

I’ve run the race more than a dozen years myself and can easily say it is one of the highlights of my year. And I have always thought very highly of the management and organization of the event.  It is truly a feat to pull this off.  But the staff does not do it alone. Each team is required to provide three volunteers to man the 36 exchange points along the course at all hours of the day and night. It takes a lot of dedication for a person to get up at 2:00 a.m., drive to the middle of the Coast Range, and direct hundreds of vans and thousands of people who are sleep deprived and reaching their limits.  And for their efforts, each volunteer gets a t-shirt that just lets people know “I helped pull off one of the greatest running events around”.

The 2009 Hood To Coast volunteer t-shirt

That’s why I was more than a little disappointed in organization’s response to an obvious mistake on the volunteer t-shirts printed for this year’s event.  As reported in The Oregonian, the bright orange t-shirt proudly declares the person wearing it is a “Race Offical” rather than “Official”. It’s an honest, if not unbelievable, mistake. And our whole running team got a chuckle out of passing around the news.  But, at our final race preparation meeting last night, all we could talk about was the dismissive response of Robert Foote, Hood to Coast Relay president, who shrugged off the mistake and said it “is pretty irrelevant in the grand scheme of things.”  What does that say about the Hood-to-Coast brand?  And how must the sponsors whose logos appear under the mispelled word feel?

I can understand and sympathize with the complexity of running an event like this.  It is a huge undertaking and, yes, a t-shirt misprint must seem like a small gaffe.  But, the dismissive public comment and failure to correct the mistake indicate leadership that fails to recognize the difficulty teams have in providing volunteers and the sacrifice those people make to help pull this event off. It also sends a message to event sponsors that the organization might not be as professional as it appears.

The only possible rationale for the decision I can think of is that it was too late to reprint the shirts once the mistake was discovered or the staff felt that the extra cost would take away from the donations that will be made to the American Cancer Society, the beneficiary of the event.  If either of those is the case, just say that rather than trying to dismiss the mistake as insignificant.

It is a lesson for all organizations (and people) that make mistakes, because we all do.  Own up to it.  Correct it. And stay true to your brand. Certainly the main event sponsor, Nike, understands this. And I hope the Hood To Coast staff has spent the last few days figuring out how they can quickly reprint the t-shirts for the 3,000+ volunteers who will be setting their alarm clocks, grabbing a coffee, and heading out to a place they’ve never heard of — all in the name of fun.