Creative View

A logo doesn’t make a brand

So, the Portland Timbers have apparently designed a new logo to be unveiled this Saturday as a step to help them move toward Major League Soccer. I’m interested to see what they’ve come up with. An article in today’s Oregonian about the logo mentions, “What if they unveil the new logo…and nobody cheers?” Well, if that happens, perhaps it’s because a logo doesn’t make the brand.

Below is a visual timeline that showcases the the various logos used by the Timbers, as it appeared in The Oregonian article.

GS.00024033A_SP.TIMBERSLOGOS.JPG

What’s interesting, from a brand perspective is all the hoopla around the unveiling of a logo. If the identity used during the 2001-2004 timeframe didn’t “catch on with fans” perhaps it was less about the design and more to do with the Timbers‘ brand itself. Are the Timbers positioned well? What’s their distinction in the Portland sports market that sets them a part from other sporting options? It helps they are the only soccer team, but other than that, what’s the promise? And what does the brand stand for? I’m not sure I know and I’m a soccer fan. I do know that the Timbers along with owner and business phenom Merritt Paulson are hanging their hats on this as their step to the majors. And the development process took more than a year including research. All well and good, but that’s a lot riding on a mark. And, the questions I have for Paulson and the team? Tell me what the Timbers stand for. Tell me the experience I’ll have attending matches. Tell me what you are promising and how you’ll deliver. Then with the answers hold the new logo up in the mirror and tell me what you see.

[Added 6/12 post logo unveiling]

So the new Portland Timbers’ logo has been unveiled. See it for yourself here. Was there cheering? Don’t know. But the outcome is…just okay. Slightly uninspiring. At least the Oregon Ducks will surely enjoy the color combo.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Is This Really Seattle’s Best?

Seattle's Best - new logo

Whatever happened to the distinct, strong brands? Will someone please tell me? It’s feeling more and more like a game of how low can you go to appeal to the masses. Granted Seattle’s Best is owned by Starbucks and the brand will be coming to a Burger King, Subway and movie theaters near you but did that mean to translate the brand’s identity in this way - oversimplified to the point of barely being recognizable? You dipped my Target into your blood bank.

So, I admit, the original Seattle’s Best logo was dated, as was the brand overall. But, at least the old logo had some history and recognition. It wasn’t in a circle. It didn’t have a tear drop. And, since when is coffee red?

What’s the consumer supposed to take away from this new and improved logo? Simple. Generic. Regular. Bland. Red coffee? And how does this reflect on the Seattle’s Best brand in general? With the shift to a broader scope of consumers and to potentially compete with the likes of Dunkin’ Donuts, positioning Seattle’s Best as the brand to go that mile versus Starbucks makes complete sense, but the way the Seattle’s Best brand is perceived is what will make or break this business decision. You might not like the coffee, but at least Dunkin’ Donuts has a huge, loyal following. Does anyone drink Seattle’s Best? Would you now?

If mediocrity was the goal then ding ding ding, we may have a winner. But brands that settle for mediocre tend to get that mediocrity reflected upon their products and consumers wind up walking on by. Hey you, Ms. Consumer. We know you want that cup right about now. How about a tall, steaming hot cup of average. Doesn’t that hit the spot? Mediocre doesn’t even get you to second best. It’s not even challenger status. It’s barely…there.

Starbucks has their own brand to maintain so I’ll cut some slack that adding a new brand to the mix makes their job slightly more work, but if they plan to be successful they need to look at a different brand architecture that allows the growth of the brands independently. Give Seattle’s Best the distinction that at least position’s it against the competition. Heck, make Dunkin’ Donuts run for their money.

It’s just a sad day when commonplace rules the roost. When you don’t stand for something, it makes it very difficult to compete on anything other than price. And competing on price turns the brand into a commodity. No business wants to be there. So, will all the distinct, strong brands out there please stand up? I’d like to buy you a cup of joe.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Yo Chrysler, what you gonna do now? Right now?

Chrysler is a registered trademark of Chrysler Group LLC., Fiat is a registered trademark of Fiat Group Automobiles SpA

We all know about the troubles of the Big Three automakers in America. Deteriorating market share, strengthening competition, buyouts, bailouts, selloffs, consolidations, greening, heath care costs, unions, suppliers, loans, losses, more losses, our money, their money, someone else’s money… in the eternal words of Shaggy Rogers (of Scooby-Doo fame)…zoinks!

Forgetting about the healthier two of the trio for the moment, let’s talk about Chrysler. Chrysler is in a unique and unenviable position. Always the underdog, Chrysler has been on the ropes for quite a while. After the Daimler/Chrysler foxtrot fizzled, a new dance partner stepped in, the venture capital firm Cerberus. A few months later, yet another dancer stepped into the ring, Mr. Economy. The ménage á trois of Cerebus, Chrysler and Mr. Economy quickly started to circle the sombrero of diminishing returns. With mounting losses and no new venture capital to be found the Cerberus/Crysler newlyweds, (along with their distant cousin, General Motors) went to Capitol Hill looking for a loan. We all know what happened there, we gave them money. But with Chrysler there was a caveat, they must find yet another new dancer to tango with, enter Fiat SpA. Expensive shoes, nicely coiffed hair, and some old world style.

So you may be asking how this applies to marketing? I’m getting to that. You see Fiat and Chrysler have little problem, it’s called time. Because of production cycles, engineering workload, scales of economy, exchange rates, legal wrangling, and perhaps the moon, the first big influx of Fiat-based Chrysler products won’t be released until model year 2012. That’s one-and-a-half model years before new products with new engineering and the new Fiat/Chrysler brand strategy are fully in place. One-and-a-half years of scraping together a viable product line. One-and-a-half years of gap filling marketing. One-and-a-half years is an eternity for a company losing market share and sucking wind as hard as Chrysler. So what are Fiat SpA and Chrysler going to do?

Well, the first step was to re-brand the Dodge Ram truck series into its own singular brand now called Ram. A new ad campaign featuring five TV spots showcasing the recreational and vocational attributes of the new Ram brand. Seven print ads, and a new website, RamTrucks.com to support the spots. To further support the work hard, play hard attitude of Ram Truck customers, Fiat SpA/Chrysler came up with the Outfitter.RamTrucks.com site. Within this online wonderland, you can purchase a Ram brand G-Shock watch or an 18-can camouflaged cooler, or a bunch of t-shirts and other apparel emblazoned with Ram brandiness. Or maybe that’s Brand Raminess. Oh and they also have a blog, “Ram Zone”, and they say they will also leverage social media such as Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Flickr, and the like to connect with like-minded Ram loyalists.

Next was to re-focus Dodge as a fun/lifestyle brand. Many of us have seen the “Man’s Last Stand” Super Bowl ad and the “We Make Getaway Cars” ad featuring the wheel-spinning tire-smoking, bad-ass Dodge Charger. These two ads, coming from distinctly different viewpoints, male and female, show how misogyny and misandry can both be relieved by pressing your right foot down really really hard on a gas petal. I’m not sure how these two TV spots speak to fun or lifestyle unless you enjoy lousy painful relationships.

Part three, re-focus Jeep to be a “dreamers/adventurers” brand. Jeep product advertising will center on lifestyle with the message that Jeep owners live life by their own set of rules/terms, “I live. I ride. I am. Jeep.” Kim Adams House, head of Jeep Brand Communications, “We want to expand the reach of the brand and provide examples…to see inside the people’s lives who embrace the Jeep lifestyle.” This is a switch from the traditional Jeep branding, the outdoor, go anywhere, macho vehicle that goes where no man has gone before, unless he had a Jeep of course. The new dreamers/adventurers advertising features a woman driving a convertible Jeep Wrangler after a visiting a hair salon in “It’s Only Hair,” a woman driving a carpool in a Jeep Liberty in “Open Lane,” a father and son and a Jeep Grand Cherokee story with a dad on a skateboard in “Dinner’s Ready,” and a Chihuahua in a Jeep Patriot living the good life in “This Dog’s Life.” Not your typical Jeep story lines.

Step D, do something with the Chrysler brand. Push it upscale? We know a couple models will be dropped, the PT Cruiser, and the woeful Sebring (it will be heavily reworked and brought back with a different name). That will leave the Chrysler brand with the 300 sedan and the Town and Country minivan. Not much of a brand lineup. There is talk of Fiat SpA bringing the Alfa Romeo brand back to the U.S., selling it through the Chrysler dealer network. It would give Chrysler a premium brand to compete against the likes of Lexus, Audi, Infinity, and Acura. But with Alfa having left the U.S. market during the mid-1990s with such a poor track record, will the memories and prejudices be able to be overcome? The campaign for that one will be most interesting.

So, as the next year and a half progresses Chrysler and Fiat SpA will have many challenges with repositioning, re-building and clawing their way out of the American automobile abyss. I have a feeling there will be more than one media rep with a smiling face, who will receive the windfall of this colossal reshaping of American perceptions. So turn off your DVRs, re-up your subscriptions, start watching those pitiful sitcoms and healthcare based dramas, and enjoy the front row seat watching it all happen. Besides, in the end, you probably paid for it.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Color of the Year

Posted by Jeff Boyce on February 08, 2010
Creative View, Trends / 3 Comments

On December 8, 2009 Pantone® officially announced their choice for the 2010 color of the year.  And the winner is – Pantone 15-5519. A round of applause if you please. Pantone 15-5519 or better known as, turquoise.

Turquoise!?! Whaaa? After last year’s mimosa, turquoise is a bit of dull thud in the empty swimming pool of hexadecimal life.

Insert fuzzy swirling images here.

I believe it was the year 1972 in which my family purchased a Dodge truck in a stunning shade of turquoise. The three most memorable things about this truck for me are; one, the color, two, a chilling winter trip from Portland to Hood River with myself and my sister stuck in the back with a catalytic heater for warmth, and three, a brutally hot trip to Sumpter, Oregon, in the middle of summer, with the whole family jammed into the cab. Two parents, three children, no air conditioning. I spent most of the Sumpter trip curled up on the floorboards underneath my mother’s feet in a state of heat-induced delirium.  The combined smell of rubber soled shoes, transmission fluid and graham crackers is still a stifling memory.  But really, the thing I remember most about that truck, is the color.

De-fuzz and un-swirl images.

At this point in my life, I cut Dodge a fair bit of slack for the color choice. My parents, not so much. It was the early 1970s, the world was just coming out of the 60s, the Vietnam War was winding down, free love, the hippie movement, Berkley and turquoise. Dodge was just trying to be hip. As for my parents, I have to believe it was the last truck on the lot and it was at a really good price.

So why did Pantone choose 15-5519 to be their color of the year? According to their press release on the subject, they say this: “In many cultures, Turquoise occupies a very special position in the world of color,” explains Leatrice Eiseman, executive director of the Pantone Color Institute®. “It is believed to be a protective talisman, a color of deep compassion and healing, and a color of faith and truth, inspired by water and sky. Through years of color word-association studies, we also find that Turquoise represents an escape to many – taking them to a tropical paradise that is pleasant and inviting, even if only a fantasy.”  Further: “Turquoise adds a splash of excitement to neutrals and browns, complements reds and pinks, creates a classic maritime look with deep blues, livens up all other greens, and is especially trend-setting with yellow-greens.”  Hmmm.  A protective talisman, signals deep compassion and healing, the color of faith and truth, inspired by water and sky, adds excitement, a classic maritime look, ESPECIALLY trend-setting with yellow-greens!  Pshaw I say! Obviously they never spent 9 hours on the floorboards of a turquoise Dodge truck in the middle of August on a trip to Sumpter, Oregon.

I can’t wait for 2011.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Portland’s Creative Should Live Out Loud

Photo courtesy of www.portlandground.com

Photo courtesy of www.portlandground.com

I love Portland. We’re not the city that never sleeps. We’re not the windy city. And, we’re not filled with tinsel, bleached hair and botox. But, we are overshadowed by other cities, especially when it comes to creative – and that’s a shame (or a sham depending on how you look at it). Creativity thrives here in our fair City of Roses (regardless of what Fast Company thinks). And with more than 1,500 companies, large and small, in the creative services industry, we contribute a fair share of professional services business revenue and jobs. Yet for some reason, we’re afraid to toot the horn let alone blow a low whistle (a little music once in a while is okay people). Maybe we think we’re great but need proof. Or we’re overly modest. Either way, consider this:

  1. Creative services industry employs roughly 15,000 people in Portland
  2. We have 344 designers per 100K residents – more than LA and Austin (according to Bureau of Labor Stats ’08 in Greater Portland Prosperity 2009)
  3. The creative vitality here (based on the National Creative Vitality Index - yes there is such a thing) is more than twice the national baseline
  4. Portland is among one of the most innovative cities, ranked 6 by Forbes for most patents, and 6th for both entrepreneurship and small business (Creative Capacity Project)
  5. Creative industries generate nearly $2 billion and a payroll of nearly $1 billion annually (that’s no chump change) (Creative Capacity Project)
  6. More than half of Oregon’s creative firms are concentrated in Portland (Creative Capacity Project)

Portland is a great place to be – to live and work. But we know that already. Even though we’re pushing through a rough spot and our state has one of the highest unemployment rates in the country, we don’t have the brain drain other cities are facing. In fact, we’ve got some brain gain going on. More people are moving here from out-of-state than to our western compatriots (that’d be Seattle, Albuquerque, Austin, San Diego, Denver, San Jose, San Francisco, Los Angeles and Sacremento). The region is a magnet for all kinds of talented professionals – a chunk of them in the the creative industry and they’d rather be here than someplace else. Some get the entrepreneurial bug. It’s quite catchy here. Some freelance for local agencies or work directly with clients and supplement with other jobs. Baristas or bartenders are common, but more often they are artists, writers and musicians. Perhaps this is why Forbes dubbed Portland one of the best metro areas in which to ride out the recession. The great coffee, local microbrews, top notch wineries, and growing spirit distillers are definitely a bonus. And innovation abounds (the coffee, beer, wine, and spirits help) with the booming food scene, developing clean/green tech industry, the variety of arts and yes, our creative services industry. There’s no doubt the quality of life here is a big pull for newbies and the anchor for those of us here.  But to keep all this quiet, to simply sit idle hoping the great creative work gets noticed, isn’t the best strategy to help grow an industry sector. We all want good clients whether they reside here locally or in other regions – and other regions are touting their creative (some quite loudly).

So, what makes Portland such a great creative place? I posed this question (on Twitter) to fellow Portlanders and here’s a short list of what they said:

Portland is a great creative city because there are no rules. @DanFellini

Because Portlanders are real people. The lack of restriction and openness promotes a more creative and less stifled spirit. @massagepdx

It’s not that I don’t play well with others; I just want to choose where, when and with whom I play. [It's the] PDX attitude. @LogoMotives

Despite local chagrin, the influx of creatives from all over the country converging here brings broad perspective. @Metroknow

I have mixed feelings about it as a creative city. It’s like a college graduate: full of potential. Now it needs to find its way. @swestbrook

PDXers are curious and not too self-obsessed. Our lives are generally balanced and we leave room for non-work projects. We’re generally tolerant and open to new ideas=innovation. We’re risk takers and revel in a good fail-as-learning experience. @thisKat

Portland creativity=cuz we have twice the creative fuel with half the financial pressure. @vizeboogie

Because in PDX, there is life other than work, and that drives us to be more creative and inspired. @KevMurphy

We are passionate about living. We are free spirits. We celebrate…our ability to listen to ideas that we might not hold dear to ourselves. We live our lives out loud. @dtboyd

It’s this last point, living out loud, that strikes home.  Portland should take pride in our creative abilities and capabilities and not be afraid to shout them to the world.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,